MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1918632343 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.486

Is there a better way to work-up kidney stones?

2013· article· en· W1918632343 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kenneth T. Pace

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidney stonesWork (physics)Computer scienceMedicineEngineeringUrologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

collection is needed to assess the trade-offs between a more costly test (the former) and a test with potentially more false-positive results (the latter). Finally, it is not surprising that the measured supersaturation of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate will be lower than supersaturation levels calculated from 24-hour collection data because the latter data do not account for ionic stabilizers and stone inhibitors such as citrate. Perhaps modification to Equil 2 calculations to incorporate citrate concentration might lead to a more accurate estimation of supersaturation from 24-hour urine values. More work is clearly needed before it is recommended that physicians replace the venerable 24-hour urine collection (imperfect and limited though it is) in the medical evaluation of recurrent stone formers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207