MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1918822394 · doi:10.4000/diacronie.2831

Los SIG como instrumento para el análisis de las migraciones: el ejemplo del éxodo catalán de 1936

2012· article· es· W1918822394 on OpenAlex
Cécile Burel, Jordi Rubió, Josep Sitjàr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiacronie · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fin dalle sue origini, con la nascita nel 1962 del primo Sistema d’Informazione Geografica (SIG) – il Sistema d’Informazione Geografica del Canada (CGIS) –, l’evoluzione vissuta da questi sistemi è stata formidabile e i loro ambiti di applicazione ogni volta più numerosi, con la progressiva copertura di un ampio spettro di discipline che hanno tratto profitto dal loro potenziale. Sono ancora molte, tuttavia, le funzionalità da valorizzare.Ed è precisamente in questo contesto, nell’utilizzo cioè dei SIG nell’ambito di campi del sapere non strettamente collegati alla geografia quantitativa attuale, che si misura maggiormente il valore aggiunto che tali sistemi possono apportare anche negli studi e nelle analisi dei processi storici, come dimostra il caso della tesi El éxodo catalán de 1936 a través de los Pirineos. De la derrota a la victoria qui discussa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it