MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1919153751 · doi:10.1002/wcm.2479

Optimized bandwidth allocation in broadband wireless access networks

2014· article· en· W1919153751 on OpenAlexaff
Nidal Nasser, Reid Miller, Amir Esmailpour, Abd‐Elhamid M. Taha, Tarek Bejaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueWireless Communications and Mobile Computing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWiMAXComputer networkWireless broadband3rd Generation Partnership Project 2Quality of serviceHandoverInteroperabilityMobile broadbandIMT AdvancedBandwidth (computing)ExploitBandwidth allocationWirelessFemtocellBroadbandWireless networkTelecommunicationsBase stationMobile computingMobile technologyComputer securityMobile WebTelecommunications link

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Towards satisfying the requirements of International Mobile Telecommunications–Advanced, both the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) introduced revolutionary wireless technologies, exploiting advanced technologies and architectures. Both IEEE's 802.16 (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX)) and 3GPP's Long Term Evolution have been introduced to accommodate the increasing demand for mobile services and applications. To realize the true potential of these technologies, however, opportunistic frameworks for radio resource management must be designed to exploit the adaptive nature of mobile traffic. The utility optimized quality‐of‐service (QoS) framework proposed in this paper for the mobile WiMAX networks achieves this objective. To maintain support for QoS guarantees, the framework capitalizes on the adaptive nature of WiMAX traffic by individually linking connections with a utility function designed to both uphold the end users’ perceived performance and determine bandwidth allocations by a search tree maximization algorithm. In doing so, bandwidth utilization is maximized for all active connections, and blocking and dropping probabilities for new and handover calls, respectively, are minimized. The framework is evaluated through an extensive simulation model and is shown to outperform state‐of‐the‐art solutions. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWireless Communications and Mobile ComputingSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207