MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1919838631 · doi:10.1002/env.2199

Spatio–temporal modeling for disease mapping using CAR and B‐spline smoothing

2013· article· en· W1919838631 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mahmoud Torabi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmetrics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFrequentist inferenceSmoothingMarkov chain Monte CarloAutoregressive modelComputer scienceBayesian probabilityEconometricsSpline (mechanical)StatisticsData miningMathematicsAlgorithmBayesian inferenceArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, generalized additive mixed models are constructed for the analysis of geographical and temporal variability of disease ratios. In this class of models, spatio–temporal models that use conditionally autoregressive smoothing across the spatial dimension and B‐spline smoothing over the temporal dimension are considered. The frequentist analysis of these complex models is computationally difficult. On the other hand, the advent of the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm has made the Bayesian analysis of complex models computationally convenient. Recently developed data cloning (DC) method provides a frequentist approach to mixed models and equally computationally convenient. We propose to use DC, which yields to maximum likelihood estimation, to conduct frequentist analysis of spatio–temporal modeling of disease ratios. The advantages of DC approach are that the non‐estimable parameters are flagged automatically and prediction (and prediction intervals) of the smoothing incidence ratios over space and time are easily obtained. We illustrate this approach using a real dataset of yearly childhood asthma visits to hospital in the province of Manitoba, Canada, during 2000–2010. The performance of the DC approach is also studied through a simulation study. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmetricsSame topicdemographic modeling and climate adaptationFrench-language works237,207