MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1919953259 · doi:10.14288/bcs.v0i88.1369

Rocky Mountain Fort: Archaeological Research and the Late Eighteenth-century North West Company Expansion into British Columbia

2010· article· en· W1919953259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyShoreBeaverGeographyExcavationConfusionHistoryGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent BC Studies article by K. F. Fladmark ( 1985 ) provides a summary overview of early fur trade history along the upper Peace River in British Columbia. This history begins with Alexander Mackenzie's voyage to the Pacific coast in 1793, and continues to 1823 when the occupants of St. John's, a post at the Beatton River mouth, were murdered by Beaver Indians. For all but three of these years ( 1820-23 ), the North West Com­ pany exercised monopolistic control. Fladmark notes that primary docu­ ments relating to this period are few, and confusion exists over the origins and location for the sites. This is particularly so for the earliest post, Rocky Mountain Fort; a number of provincial histories have failed to recognize it altogether (e.g., Ormsby 1958). Through the diligent efforts of Fladmark, this no longer can be the case. In 1975, Fladmark (1985; also Fladmark, Finlay and Spurting 1977) rediscovered the location of Rocky Mountain through descriptions left in David Thompson's journal for the year 1804. The site was situated on the south shore of the Peace River near its confluence with the Moberly River (figure 1). Test excavations in the 1976 field season (Spurting, Finlay and Fladmark 1976), combined with archival research (F. Finlay 1976), conclusively verified Fladmark's identification. Rocky Mountain had been established by the North West Company in the last decade of the eighteenth century, and it was the earliest land-based fur trade site in British Columbia. Of equal importance, as Fladmark also notes, was the availability of a published journal (O'Neil 1928). The Journal of the Rocky Mountain Fort had been kept by an anonymous author for the trade season of 1799/1800 (O'Neil 1928). Descriptions in this docu­ ment potentially facilitate the interpretation of archaeological remains and allow for a more complete understanding of Peace River fur trade history. Since the publication of Fladmark's 1985 article, we have conducted two seasons of archaeological excavation at Rocky Mountain Fort. In the following paper we summarize the results of this work and place these data within a historical framework for the fur trade of the upper Peace River region. 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0250.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it