MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1920074324 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2000.849558

Sonar signal detection and classification using artificial neural networks

2002· article· en· W1920074324 on OpenAlex
Matthew K. Ward, M. Stevenson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonarComputer scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceSonar signal processingUnderwaterSignal processingSIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)Impulse responseSpeech recognitionDetection theorySynthetic aperture sonarDigital signal processingTelecommunicationsGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sonar signal processing is one of the main areas where artificial neural networks have made significant contributions in recent years, specifically to the task of sonar signal classification. This paper describes research that furthers that progress with the investigation of both the detection and classification of real passive sonar signals. Specifically, it examines the use of a finite impulse response neural network (FIRNN) for the continuous-mode detection and classification of real underwater transient sounds received by passive sonar. This builds on previous work where an FIRNN was applied to the pattern-mode classification of both simulated and real data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207