Real-time dynamics acquisition from irregular samples -- with application to anesthesia evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first objective of this paper is to introduce a unified approach to the D/A conversion, a real-time algorithm referred to as {\it blending operator}, based on spline functions of arbitrarily desired order, to interpolate the irregular data samples, while preserving all polynomials of the same spline order, with assured maximum order of approximation. This helps remove the two main obstacles for adapting the recently proposed time-frequency analysis technique {\it Synchrosqueezing transform} (SST) to irregular data samples in order to allow online computation. Secondly, for real-time dynamic information extraction from an oscillatory signal via SST, a family of vanishing-moment and minimum-supported spline-wavelets (to be called VM wavelets) are introduced for on-line computation of the CWT and its derivative. The second objective of this paper is to apply the proposed real-time algorithm and VM wavelets to clinical applications, particularly to the study of the "anesthetic depth" of a patient during surgery, with emphasis on analyzing two dynamic quantities: the "instantaneous frequencies" and the "non-rhythmic to rhythmic ratios" of the patient's respiration, based on a one-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signal.It is envisioned that the proposed algorithm and VM wavelets should enable real-time monitoring of "anesthetic depth", during surgery, from the respiration signal via ECG measurement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".