MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1920428582

[The life path of parents and of their children presenting an autism spectrum disorder (ASD)].

2015· article· en· W1920428582 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Poirier, Jacinthe Vallée-Ouimet

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespite careAutism spectrum disorderPsychologyFeelingPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Clinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryAutismMedicineNursingSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This research aims to study parents' experiences (n=41) of their autistic child. in regards to different aspects of his development, such as diagnosis, health, family, interventions, child care services, school and awareness of the disorder. METHODS: In order to ensure variability in the levels of severity of the disorder, forty-one parents of persons with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) were recruited either through the Fédération québécoise de l'autisme (FQA) or through a convenience sample. Participants were asked to complete a 192-item questionnaire covering respondents' demographic information, the child's diagnosis as well as information regarding health, family, respite services, child care setting, interventions, school setting, adolescence, adulthood, individual rights and awareness of the disorder. This questionnaire was reviewed by ten doctoral students in psychology and by three ASD experts to assess the relevance, the correctness and the richness of the questions. The questionnaire was adapted accordingly and was administered to 10 parents within the framework of a qualitative study. RESULTS: This study revealed that parents' primary concerns regarding their child's development regarded language development, visual contact, isolation and motor abilities. These parents also mentioned feeling positive emotions, such as pride and joy, as well as negative emotions, such as worries about their child's future. Only a few of these families used respite services and most deemed intervention services as insufficient; about half of parents were satisfied with the services provided at school. Moreover, most of adults with ASD have always lived with at least one of their parents; some have occupations, but their salary is minimal. In terms of disorder awareness, parents mentioned that they would have preferred that their child not have the disorder in order for them to live an easier life. CONCLUSION: Data obtained from this study serves to provide a better comprehension parents' experiences, which can contribute to adapting the services for families of children living with ASD. In addition, an increase in public funding for intervention and respite services is recommended as it was considered insufficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→