MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W192101469 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-428-4_6

A Deleuzian Approach to Information

2013· book-chapter· en· W192101469 on OpenAlex
Kane X. Faucher

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational futures · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCybernetics and Technology in Society
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMistakeField (mathematics)Computer scienceEpistemologyCognitive scienceData sciencePsychologyPhilosophyMathematicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It would be a mistake to say that Deleuze would be intent on formalizing a theory of information, but would be more likely to move toward a problematic. Any movement toward theorizing that eventually ossifies into a full theory is to encounter blockages, to hit the proverbial wall. It is only in discovering the becoming-mad of objects, to embrace the accidents that condition and resolve problems on a field of problemata , are we capable of discovering the abstract machine that diagrams the problems themselves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it