Spanifold: spanning tree flattening onto lower dimension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dimensionality reduction and manifold learning techniques attempt to recover a lower‐dimensional submanifold from the data as encoded in high dimensions. Many techniques, linear or non‐linear, have been introduced in the literature. Standard methods, such as Isomap and local linear embedding, map the high‐dimensional data points into a low dimension so as to globally minimize a so‐called energy function, which measures the mismatch between the precise geometry in high dimensions and the approximate geometry in low dimensions. However, the local effects of such minimizations are often unpredictable, because the energy minimization algorithms are global in nature. In contrast to these methods, the Spanifold algorithm of this paper constructs a tree on the manifold and flattens the manifold in such a way as to approximately preserve pairwise distance relationships within the tree. The vertices of this tree are the data points, and the edges of the tree form a subset of the edges of the nearest‐neighbour graph on the data. In addition, the pairwise distances between data points close to the root of the tree undergo minimal distortion as the data are flattened. This allows the user to design the flattening algorithm so as to approximately preserve neighbour relationships in any chosen local region of the data. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".