MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1921604567

Les pensées Dialectiques en Politique de Confucius

2015· article· fr· W1921604567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jiong Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyEthnologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les pensees dialectiques sur les problemes politiques, ou les elements de ces pensees un peu disperses, nous l’avons montre, existent reellement dans la doctrine politique de  Confucius. Nous avons donc extrait, de ses nombreux entretiens, les principales reflexions dialectiques en politique de ce grand maitre, qui avait traite des relations entre les phenomenes politiques apparemment opposes comme la clemence et l’intransigeance et ceux qui n’etaient pas lies en apparence tels que le perfectionnement de soi et l’administration des autres. Ces reflexions temoignent, par un raisonnement dialectique, de la haute sagesse de Confucius sur les problemes politiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.039
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicChinese history and philosophy→French-language works237,207→