MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1921907741 · doi:10.1016/s2352-3018(15)00137-x

Causes of hospital admission among people living with HIV worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2015· review· en· W1921907741 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Ford, Zara Shubber, Graeme Meintjes, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Serge Paul Eholié, Edward J. Mills, Mary‐Ann Davies, Marco Vitória, Martina Penazzato, Sabin Nsanzimana, Lisa Frigati, D. O’Brien, Tom Ellman, Olawale Ajose, Alexandra Calmy, Meg Doherty

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet HIV · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV-related health complications and treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
FundersWellcome TrustWorld Health Organization
KeywordsMedicineWastingMalnutritionDiseaseMEDLINEPediatricsComorbidityHospital admissionIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.034
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations329
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet HIVSame topicHIV-related health complications and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207