MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1922195387 · doi:10.7202/1026106ar

Les technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) et la promotion de la santé sexuelle chez les jeunes autochtones du Québec

2014· article· fr· W1922195387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches amérindiennes au Québec · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Canadian institutionsFirst Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services CommissionUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude visait à documenter les habitudes et préférences des jeunes (13-25 ans) des Premières Nations (PN) du Québec en regard des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC). Elle fut réalisée dans le cadre d'une évaluation de faisabilité d'interventions utilisant les TIC pour la promotion de la santé sexuelle et reproductive (SSR). Selon le questionnaire qui a été présenté à 192 participants par sondage électronique, plus de 60 % des répondants ont un accès régulier aux outils technologiques les plus mentionnés dans la littérature portant sur les interventions utilisant les TIC pour la promotion de la SSR et la prévention des ITSS/VIH/sida auprès des adolescents. Toutefois, ils préfèrent Internet comme canal pour recevoir de l'information sur la SSR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it