Gastric emptying, intestinal absorption of electrolytes and exercise performance in electrolyte‐supplemented horses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the central question of this study? The study addresses whether electrolyte supplementation of horses one hour prior to exercise improves hydration and exercise performance. What is the main findings and its importance? We used radiotracer methodologies to identify that 3L was the minimum amount of electrolyte supplement required to maintain hydration and replace plasma electrolytes lost by sweating. By maintaining hydration and plasma electrolyte concentrations sub‐maximal exercise duration was extended. Horses lose considerably more electrolytes through sweating during prolonged exercise than can be readily replaced through feeds. The present study tested an oral electrolyte supplement (ES) designed to replace sweat electrolyte losses. We measured gastric emptying of 3 litres of ES (using gamma imaging of99Tc‐sulfide colloid), the absorption of Na+and K+from the gastrointestinal tract using24Na+and42K+, and the distribution of these ions in the body by measuring radioactivity within plasma and sweat during exercise. Three litres of ES emptied from the stomach as fast as water, with a half‐time of 47 min, and appeared in plasma by 10 min after administration (n= 4 horses). Peak values of plasma24Na+and42K+radioactivity occurred at 20–40 min, and a more rapid disappearance of K+radioactivity from plasma was indicative of movement of K+into cells (n= 3 horses). In a randomized crossover experiment (n= 4 horses), 1 h after administration of placebo (water), 1 or 3 litres of ES containing24Na+, horses exercised on a treadmill at 30% of peak oxygen uptake until voluntary fatigue. The24Na+appeared in sweat at 10 min of exercise, and when horses received 3 litres of ES the duration to voluntary fatigue was increased in all horses by 33 ± 10%. It is concluded that an oral ES designed to replace sweat ion losses was rapidly emptied from the gastrointestinal tract, rapidly absorbed in the upper intestinal tract and rapidly distributed within the body. The ES clearly served as a reservoir to replace sweat ion losses during exercise, and administration of ES prior to exercise resulted in increased duration of submaximal exercise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".