MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W192248321 · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-95029-1_2

Zur Normalisierung von Heterosexualität in den House of Commons Debatten zur Gesetzesvorlage C-33, 1996

2002· book-chapter· de· W192248321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela de Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueVS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiscrimination and Equality Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceStatuteHouse of CommonsLawPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Am 29. April 1996 legte der damalige Justizminister und Mitglied der regierenden Liberal Party, Allan Rock, die Gesetzesvorlage C-33, ein Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Canadian Human Rights Act dem 35. Parlament vor (House of Commons Debates1 1996, S. 2070).2 Die Gesetzesvorlage C-33 war dazu bestimmt, sexuelle Orientierung als einen untersagten Diskriminierungsgrund in Gebieten, die föderaler Jurisdiktion unterliegen, einzuschließen (Chotalia 1997, S. xlvii). Die Gesetzesvorlage wurde nach der dritten Lesung am 9. Mai 1996 angenommen (Debates 1996, S. 2569) und erhielt die königliche Genehmigung am 20. Juni 1996 (Statutes of Canada, Kapitel 14).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooksSame topicDiscrimination and Equality LawFrench-language works237,207