Exploring the Development of China’s National Economics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presently the economic studies in China rely mainly on western theories, which, however, prove to be far from enough for research and study of Chinese issues. If the same mode is used for the modernization of different nations and different regions, then why should the different nations and national economies exist at all? And what consequences would be caused? How to build the socialism with Chinese characteristics? All of these issues cannot be explained by simply using general economic theories, requirements and goals. The approach of development through a pure pursuit of economic growth and using it as a criterion to judge social development is highly limited. The limitation of “economic imperialism” is becoming increasingly highlighted. What is the core theory of the “Chinese economics”? What is the development trend of the “Chinese economics”? Total Westernization is not a solution and digitalization will not solve the problem, either. Undoubtedly, any Chinese economics without considering exiting conditions in China and its national economy can hardly be reasonable. A study of China’s national economics is a development of its nationality research and also an extension of China’s economics and cultural studies. Therefore the national economics can be viewed as an integration of all the three key factors, ie. nationality, economy and culture. The national economics is a brand-new field of learning. It occupies a special place in the national studies and has also developed as the main contents of national studies. Besides, it is becoming increasingly important in economic studies and has become a special field for present economic studies. The study and research of national economics is very important and significant. Keywords: National Economics, Disciplinary Construction, Theoretical Innovation Resume En ce qui concerne la recherche actuelle de l’economie, la theorie fondamentale de la science economique de notre pays reste encore la theorie economique occidentale. Neanmoins, il ne suffit pas de recourir seulement a la theorie occidentale pour etudier les problemes chinois. Si on procede a la modernisation des nations et des regions differentes par le meme modele, la nation et l’economie nationale ont encore des raisons d’etre ? Quelles sont les consequences ? Comment developper un socialisme a la chinoise ? Ces questions ne peuvent par s’expliquer par la theorie, la demande et l’objectif de la science economique generale. La conception de developpement qui vise uniquement a la croissance economique et la considere comme l’indice du developpement social presente des inconvenients, les limites de « l’imperialisme economique » s’accentuent davantage. En quoi reside le noyau theorique de « l’economie chinoise » ? Quel est l’avenir de « l’economie chinoise » ? L’occidentalisation integrale n’a pas d’issue, la numerisation ne resout pas non plus les problemes. Sans aucun doute, la science economique chinoise detachee de la realite de la Chine et de l’economie nationale est inimaginable. Alors l’etude de la science economique nationale ne constitue pas seulement le developpement de la recherche de la nation, mais aussi l’enrichissement de la recherche de l’economie chinoise, et egalement l’approfondissement de la recherche culturelle de notre pays. On peur dire que la science economique nationale est une synthese de la nation, l’economie et la culture au niveau plus haut. En tant que pays en developpement, la Chine doit accorder une grande importance a les recherches fondamentales. Dans ce sens, la science economique nationale est en soi une discipline importante, singuliere et prometteuse de la science economique chinoise. La science economique nationale, une nouvelle discipline, occupe une place extraordinaire dans les disciplines nationales et devient le centre de la recherche des problemes nationaux. De plus, elle joue aussi un role inegligeable dans la science economique et constitue un domaine de recherche special dans l’etude economique actuelle. La recherche et l’etude de la science economique nationale recouvre de grandes significations. Mots-cles : science economique nationale, construction de discipline, innovation theorique 摘要 就目前經濟學研究而言，我國的經濟學基礎理論仍是以西方經濟學為主，但是，研究中國問題只靠西方理論是遠遠不夠的。用同一個模式進行不同民族和不同區域的現代化，民族與民族經濟還有什麼存在的意義？後果又會如何？如何發展具有中國特色的社會主義？這些問題不能用一般的經濟學理論、要求及目標來詮釋。單純追求經濟增長並以之衡量社會發展的發展觀存在許多缺陷，“經濟帝國主義”的局限性越來越突出。 “中國經濟學”的理論核心是什麼？“中國經濟學”向何處去？全盤西化沒有出路，數位化也不能解決問題。毫無疑問，脫離中國實際的、脫離民族經濟的中國經濟學是不可思議的。而民族經濟學的研究不僅是我國民族學研究的發展，更是中國經濟學研究的拓展，也是我國文化學研究的深化。可以說，民族經濟學是民族、經濟、文化三個因素在更高層面的整合。中國作為發展中國家，一些基礎性研究應予以重視，從這個意義上來說，民族經濟學本身就是中國經濟學的一個非常重要而獨特、並且非常有發展前景的一個學科。民族經濟學是一門新興的學科。它不僅在民族學科中佔有特殊的地位，並已經成為民族問題研究的主要內容，而且它在經濟學科中也佔有不可忽視的重要地位，是現階段經濟研究中的一個特殊領域。研究和學習民族經濟學有著非常重要的意義和作用。 關鍵詞：民族經濟學；學科建設；理論創新
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it