MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Search for Solar Axions by the CERN Axion Solar Telescope with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>Buffer Gas: Closing the Hot Dark Matter Gap

2014· article· lv· W1922593157 on OpenAlexaff
M. Arik, S. Aune, K. Barth, А. С. Белов, S. Borghi, H. Bräuninger, G. Cantatore, J. M. Carmona, S. A. Çetin, J. I. Collar, Enrico Da Riva, T. Dafní, M. Davenport, C. Eleftheriadis, N. Elias, G. Fanourakis, E. Ferrer-Ribas, P. Friedrich, J. Galán, José Miguel Alonso Garcia, A. Gardikiotis, J.G. Garza, E. N. Gazis, T. Geralis, E. Georgiopoulou, I. Giomataris, S. Gninenko, H. Gómez, M. Gómez Marzoa, E. Gruber, T. Guthörl, Robert Hartmann, Steffen Hauf, F. Haug, M. D. Hasinoff, D. H. H. Hoffmann, F.J. Iguaz, I.G. Irastorza, J. Jacoby, K. Jakovčić, M. Karuza, K. Königsmann, R. Kotthaus, M. Krčmar, M. Kuster, B. Lakić, P. Lang, Jean‐Paul Laurent, A. Liolios, A. Ljubičić, G. Luzón, S. Neff, T. Niinikoski, Annika Nordt, T. Papaevangelou, M. J. Pivovaroff, Georg G. Raffelt, H. Riege, Alejandro Soto Rodríguez, M. Rosu, J. Ruz, I. Savvidis, I. Shilon, P. S. Silva, S. K. Solanki, L. Stewart, A. Tomás, M. Tsagri, K. van Bibber, T. Vafeiadis, J.A. Villar, J. K. Vogel, S.C. Yildiz, K. Zioutas

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAxionPhysicsLarge Hadron ColliderTelescopeParticle physicsSolar coreDark matterObservatoryAstrophysicsSolar neutrinoNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CERN Axion Solar Telescope has finished its search for solar axions with $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ buffer gas, covering the search range $0.64\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{m}_{a}\ensuremath{\lesssim}1.17\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{eV}$. This closes the gap to the cosmological hot dark matter limit and actually overlaps with it. From the absence of excess x rays when the magnet was pointing to the Sun we set a typical upper limit on the axion-photon coupling of ${g}_{a\ensuremath{\gamma}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}3.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{GeV}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at 95% C.L., with the exact value depending on the pressure setting. Future direct solar axion searches will focus on increasing the sensitivity to smaller values of ${g}_{a\ensuremath{\gamma}}$, for example by the currently discussed next generation helioscope International AXion Observatory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207