MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Angiotensin receptor blockers are associated with a lower remodelling score of stenotic aortic valves

2011· article· en· W1923019781 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInternal medicineCardiologyMedicineBicuspid valveStenosisAngiotensin Receptor BlockersCalcificationBicuspid aortic valveAortic valveAortic valve stenosisRenin–angiotensin systemBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) might be useful to slow the progression of valvular calcification in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between the weight and tissue remodelling score of stenotic aortic valves explanted at the time of valve replacement surgery and to determine the effect of medications including angiotensin II receptor type I blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on these variables. METHODS: Aortic valve and blood plasma were collected in 208 patients with AS (mean age: 69 ± 9) who underwent aortic valve replacement. Valves were weighed and the degree of valve tissue remodelling was assessed using a modified scoring system from Warren (Score: 1-4). Also, the 0-cresolphtalein complexone method was used to measure the amount of calcium within the valve cusps. RESULTS: The mean weight of aortic valves was higher in men than in women (2·83 ± 0·09 vs. 1·91 ± 0·09 g, P < 0·0001), in patients with bicuspid vs. tricuspid valves (3·21 ± 0·15 vs. 2·23 ± 0·07 g, P < 0·0001), and in patients with higher remodelling score (score 2: 1·86 ± 0·19 g; score 3: 2·08 ± 0·12 g; score 4: 3·08 ± 0·1 g, P < 0·0001). The remodelling score was higher in men (3·35 ± 0·05 vs. 2·94 ± 0·07, P < 0·0001) and in bicuspid valves (3·38 ± 0·07 vs. 3·14 ± 0·05, P = 0·006). Both valve weight (r = 0·44, P < 0·0001) and remodelling score (r = 0·23, P = 0·002) correlated with calcium content within the aortic valve. Patients under ARBs medication (n = 47, 22·6%) had lower aortic valve weights (2·14 ± 0·13 g vs. 2·63 ± 0·09 g, P = 0·001) and remodelling scores (3·01 ± 0·09 vs. 3·26 ± 0·04, P = 0·009). On multivariate analyses, ARBs were significantly associated with a lower aortic valve remodelling score (P = 0·04) and weight (P = 0·02). CONCLUSIONS: ARBs were associated with lower aortic valve weight and less pronounced tissue remodelling. Further studies are needed to determine if ARBs could be used as a therapeutic avenue in AS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it