Caracterización de patrones de hordeínas en variedades mexicanas de cebada maltera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of storage proteins highly abundant in cereal seeds are the prolamins, characterized by the frequent presence of proline in their sequence. The barley prolamins are known as hordeins. The aim of this study was to obtain the hordein banding patterns for five different Mexican barley cultivars in mature seeds. In addition, the hordein patterns in processed malt of four mexican and a canadian (Metcalfe) barley cultivars were obtained. Mass Spectrometry (MS), using distinct digestion protocols, identified differential bands in the patterns. Major differences in the seed patterns between cultivars consisted in discrete bands at 100 kDa, 65 kDa and in the range of 37 to 45 kDa. In malt, the patterns were highly contrasting among Mexican cultivars as well as in Metcalfe, suggesting that hordein processing during germination and malt processing is particular to each cultivar. Finally, the MS identification demonstrated that trypsin digestion is appropriate to distinguish B and γ hordeins in malt, whereas sequential digestion with chymotrypsin and trypsin allows the identification of C hordeins in seed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".