MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1923319904 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab15

15 EFFECT OF DOSE OF ESTRADIOL VALERATE ON OVARIAN FOLLICULAR DYNAMICS IN CIDR-TREATED BEEF COWS

2004· article· en· W1923319904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstradiol valerateFollicular phaseEstrous cycleAnimal scienceOvulationBeef cattleInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBiologyEstrogenHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to investigate the effect of dose of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular growth profiles, intervals to follicular wave emergence and, following CIDR removal, estrus and ovulation in beef cows. On Day 0, 43 non-lactating, crossbred beef cows, 3 to 9 yr of age and at random stages of the estrous cycle, received a CIDR (Bioniche Animal Health; Belleville, Ontario, Canada) and were randomly allocated to one of four groups to receive no further treatment (Control; n = 10), or an injection of 1 mg (n = 11), 2 mg (n = 10), or 5 mg (n = 12) i.m. of EV (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 2 mL canola oil. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received 500 µg i.m. of cloprostenol (Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). Ovaries were examined by transrectal ultrasonography once daily until 48 h after CIDR removal to detect ovarian follicle growth profiles, and twice daily thereafter to detect ovulation. Data were analyzed by ANOVA (LSD and Bartlett’s tests) and chi-square procedures. One cow (5 mg EV group) lost the CIDR and was removed from all analyses. There was an effect of day (P < 0.0001) on CL diameter, but the effects of treatment (P = 0.3), and the treatment-by-day interaction (P = 0.1), were not significant. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 d in 7/10 (70%) Control cows and 31/32 (97%; P < 0.04) EV-treated cows (one cow in late diestrus at the time of treatment did not respond to 1 mg EV). Mean (±SD) interval from treatment to wave emergence was longer (P < 0.03) in cows treated with 5 mg EV (4.8 ± 1.2 d) than in those treated with 1 mg (3.2 ± 0.9 days) or 2 mg EV (3.4 ± 0.8 days), while Control cows were intermediate (3.8 ± 2.0 days). Although follicular wave emergence tended (P < 0.09) to be more synchronous in cows receiving EV, intervals from CIDR removal to estrus (P = 0.7) and ovulation (P = 0.8) did not differ among groups. Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P < 0.04) at CIDR removal and tended to be smaller (P < 0.08) just prior to ovulation in the 5 mg EV group (8.5 ± 2.2 and 13.2 ± 0.6 mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8 ± 4.6 and 15.5 ± 2.9 mm, respectively) or 1 mg EV (11.7 ± 2.5 and 15.1 ± 2.2 mm, respectively) groups, with the 2 mg EV group (10.7 ± 1.5 and 14.3 ± 1.7 mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P < 0.01) in the 2 and 5 mg EV groups than in the Control group and intermediate in the 1 mg EV group. In summary, dose of EV affected follicular dynamics, interval to and synchrony of follicular wave emergence, and dominant follicle diameter at CIDR removal and just prior to ovulation in CIDR-treated cows. However, interval from CIDR removal to estrus and ovulation was not affected by treatment. Results suggest that a dose of 2 mg EV may be most efficacious in synchronizing follicular wave emergence in CIDR-treated cows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it