Can wheat varietal mixtures buffer the impacts of water deficit?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moisture stress limits the yield and productivity of wheat, a staple food for 35% of the world’s population. The reproductive stage is the most vulnerable to moisture deficit, and genetic variation for tolerance to stress has been identified in the wheat gene pool. Introducing this complex variation into new, pure-line cultivars is difficult and time consuming. However, varietal mixtures can be an effective alternative to traditional gene pyramiding. Varietal mixtures lessen the impacts of abiotic and biotic stresses in two ways. First, they buffer yield through more efficient resource use, including soil moisture, particularly evident when mixtures comprise complementary physiological traits that influence water-use efficiency. Second, they improve resistance to root diseases and pests that limit root growth and subsequent access to, and absorption of, water from deeper in the soil profile. This review evaluates the concept of varietal mixtures and assesses their impact on crop productivity and environmental buffering. The potential of physiological and root disease resistance trait mixtures to stabilise yield is also explored. Avenues for developing compatible mixtures based on physiological traits that increase yield in water-limited environments are evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".