MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1923435829 · doi:10.7202/000225ar

Ethnographier les silences de la violence1

2009· article· fr· W1923435829 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Karine Vanthuyne

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Est fréquemment souligné, en ce qui concerne les mémoires d’atrocités, à quel point celles-ci sont en partie sinon pas totalement indicibles. Or, bien que de nombreux survivants témoignent de l’absence de mots pouvant traduire l’ampleur de l’horreur vécue, l’indicible est dit. Ces récits comportent certes des silences. Néanmoins, si on leur prête l’oreille, aurais-je appris en analysant ceux de survivants du conflit armé guatémaltèque, on peut parfois en apprendre davantage que des récits eux-mêmes. A partir de l’examen du silence de Mateo, seul témoin oculaire du massacre de la finca San Francisco, Nentón, Huehuetenango, je cherche à démontrer l’importance de s’intéresser aux non-dits si l’on veut véritablement se saisir de ce que « survivre » signifie dans le Guatemala d’aujourd’hui.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207