Immunogenicity of the Extracellular Domains of C-C Chemokine Receptor 5 and the In Vitro Effects on Simian Immunodeficiency Virus or HIV Infectivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The C-C chemokine receptor CCR5 serves an important function in chemotaxis of lymphocytes, monocytes, and dendritic cells. CCR5 is also the major coreceptor in most macrophage-tropic HIV-1 infections. Immunization of rhesus macaques with a baculovirus-generated CCR5 construct or peptides derived from the sequences of the four extracellular domains of CCR5 elicited IgG and IgA Abs, inhibition of SIV replication, and CD4+ T cell proliferative responses to three of the extracellular domains of CCR5. The immune sera reacted with cell surface CCR5 expressed on HEK 293 cells. T and B cell epitope mapping revealed major and minor T and B cell epitopes in the N-terminal, first, and second loops of CCR5. The three C-C chemokines, RANTES, macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha, and macrophage-inflammatory protein-1beta, were up-regulated by immunization with the CCR5-derived peptides, and the cell surface expression of CCR5 was decreased. The CCR5 Abs were complementary to the C-C chemokines in inhibiting HIV replication in vitro. Immunization with the four extracellular domains of CCR5 suggests that three of them are immunogenic, with maximal T cell responses being elicited by the second loop peptide. However, maximal Abs to the cell surface CCR5 or viral inhibitory Abs in vitro were induced by the N-terminal peptide. Up-regulation of the three C-C chemokines and down-modulation of cell surface CCR5 were elicited by the second loop, N-terminal, and first loop peptides. The data suggest that a dual mechanism of C-C chemokines and specific Abs may engage and down-modulate the CCR5 coreceptors and prevent in vitro HIV or SIV replication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".