MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1923533402 · doi:10.1142/s0218625x0200430x

SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY ON EPITAXIAL <font>HoBa</font><sub>2</sub><font>Cu</font><sub>3</sub><font>O</font><sub>7-δ</sub> AND <font>Bi</font><sub>2</sub><font>Sr</font><sub>2</sub><font>CaCu</font><sub>2</sub><font>O</font><sub>8+δ</sub> THIN FILMS

2002· article· en· W1923533402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Review and Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsFontEtching (microfabrication)SputteringSurface roughnessSurface finishEpitaxyMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Morphology (biology)ChemistryThin filmNanotechnologyComposite materialLayer (electronics)ChromatographyGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface topography on epitaxial HoBa 2 Cu 3 O 7-δ (HBCO) and Bi 2 Sr 2 CaCu 2 O 8+δ (BSCCO) thin films analysis by using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique was carried out. The films were deposited in situ on SrTiO 3 substrates with thicknesses ranging from 100 to 300 nm by a high-pressure sputtering process. Chemical etching with a nonaqueous solution of Br-ethanol was used to modify the surface of the samples. HBCO films showed spiral grains, while BSCCO samples exhibited a terraced growth. Etching with Br-ethanol has different effects on HBCO and BSCCO. In HBCO, etching produces clean surfaces with light changes on the surface morphology, whereas in BSCCO it conduces to strong changes in the structure and the roughness of the film surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0180.020
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.012
Bibliometrics0.0050.010
Science and technology studies0.0090.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.017
Open science0.0100.006
Research integrity0.0070.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it