Marked Strain-Specific Differences in the SU5416 Rat Model of Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We assessed the pulmonary hemodynamic response to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, type 2, inhibition using SU5416 (SU) with and without chronic hypoxia (CH) in different background strains and colonies of rats. A single subcutaneous injection of SU (20 mg/kg) or vehicle was administered to different substrains of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, and they were compared with Lewis and Fischer rats, with and without exposure to CH (10% O2 for 3 wk). Remarkably, a unique colony of SD rats from Charles River Laboratories, termed the SD-hyperresponsive type, exhibited severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with SU alone, characterized by increased right ventricular systolic pressure, right ventricular/left ventricular plus septal weight ratio, and arteriolar occlusive lesions at 7-8 weeks (all P < 0.0001 versus vehicle). In contrast, the other SD substrain from Harlan Laboratories, termed SD-typical type, as well as Fischer rats, developed severe PAH only when exposed to SU and CH, whereas Lewis rats showed only a minimal response. All SD-typical type rats survived for up to 13 weeks after SU/CH, whereas SD-hyperresponsive type rats exhibited mortality after SU and SU/CH (35% and 50%, respectively) at 8 weeks. Fischer rats exposed to SU/CH exhibited the greatest mortality at 8 weeks (78%), beginning as early as 4 weeks after SU and preceded by right ventricle enlargement. Of note, a partial recovery of PAH after 8 weeks was observed in the SD-typical type substrain only. In conclusion, variation in strain, even between colonies of the same strain, has a remarkable influence on the nature and severity of the response to SU, consistent with an important role for genetic modifiers of the PAH phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".