ENST-Drums: an extensive audio-visual database for drum signals processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ENST-Drums database is a large and varied research database for automatic drum transcription and processing: Three professional drummers specialized in different music genres were recorded. Total duration of audio material recorded per drummer is around 75 minutes. Each drummer played his own drum kit. Each sequence used either sticks, rods, brushes or mallets to increase the diversity of drum sounds. The drum kits themselves are varied, ranging from a small, portable, kit with two toms and 2 cymbals, suitable for jazz and latin music ; to a larger rock drum set with 4 toms and 5 cymbals. Each sequence is recorded on 8 individual audio channels, is filmed from two angles, and is fully annotated A large part of ENST-Drums is publicly available under some conditions. These conditions include: The use and exploitation of the database should be limited to research purposes. No commercial use is possible. The database is distributed under the licence "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)" Any document describing a research work where ENST-Drums was used should include a reference to ENST-Drums and to the paper Olivier Gillet and Gaël Richard. ENST-Drums: an extensive audio-visual database for drum signals processing, In Proc of ISMIR'06, Victoria, Canada, 2006. Acknowledgements We would like to thank: The 3 drummers: Louis Cavé, Bertrand Clouard and Frédéric Rottier. E. Thiévon (author) and Play Music Publishing (publisher) for the background accompaniment sequences. The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the French ministry of research (ACI-MusicDiscover project) and of the European Commission under the FP6-027026-K-SPACE contract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.115 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".