MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1923873069 · doi:10.1109/iecon.1994.397828

Three-phase voltage-source UPS inverter with voltage-controlled current-regulated feedback control scheme

2002· article· en· W1923873069 on OpenAlexaff
Naser Abdel‐Rahim, John E. Quaicoe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)VoltageCapacitorVoltage sourceComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Voltage regulatorWaveformThree-phaseInverterElectronic engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel control strategy for three-phase voltage-source UPS inverters with second order L-C filters. The control scheme is based on sensing the current in the filter capacitor and using it in an inner feedback loop. An outer capacitor voltage loop is also incorporated to ensure sinusoidal load voltage. A general model of the power circuit (inverter, filter, and load) is first established. Computer simulation results of the proposed three-phase voltage-source UPS system with an R-L load from "cold" start to full-load is then presented to demonstrate the suitability of the proposed control scheme for UPS applications. The dynamic response of the proposed scheme is investigated using rotating frame of reference and small signal approximation. A control loop regulator is then selected to enhance the dynamic response of the control scheme and achieve the desired performance of the UPS system. It is shown in the paper that the control scheme offers many advantages for UPS applications. It is simple to implement and capable of producing nearly perfect sinusoidal load voltage waveform at moderate switching frequency and reasonable size of filter parameters. The scheme has fast dynamic response and provides high voltage utilization of the DC source. In addition, it provides peak current limiting capability and lends itself to both linear and nonlinear load applications.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207