MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1924225334 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0804050

Cutting Edge: CD28 Engagement Releases Antigen-Activated Invariant NKT Cells from the Inhibitory Effects of PD-1

2009· article· en· W1924225334 on OpenAlexaff
Jianxiong Wang, Cheng Lu, Zenebech Wondimu, Mark G. Swain, Pere Santamaría, Yang Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD28Cell biologyNatural killer T cellSecretionImmune systemEffectorBiologyAntigenImmunologyChemistryT cellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Costimulatory and coinhibitory signals are important for the maintenance of immune homeostasis both in the steady state and during immune responses. In this study, we explore the relative contributions of these signals to the rapid production of large amounts of cytokines by activated invariant NKT cells (iNKT cells). We find that upon antigenic stimulation, iNKT cells rapidly up-regulate programmed death (PD)-1 and induce high levels of PD ligand 1 and costimulatory molecules on the surface of cognate Ag-presenting dendritic cells and that iNKT cells require a CD28 signal to secrete cytokines in the presence of a PD-1/PD ligand 1 interaction. CD28-deficient iNKT cells synthesized but failed to secrete cytokines during activation, and blockade of the PD-1 pathway restored the ability of CD28-deficient iNKT cells to secrete cytokines. The opposing functions of CD28 and PD-1 thus tightly regulate the unique effector function iNKT cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207