MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1924309967

A More Open and Secure Border for Trade, Investment and People

2009· preprint· en· W1924309967 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Grady

Bibliographic record

VenueMunich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · 2009
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMantraProsperityInternational tradeGovernment (linguistics)TerrorismBusinessInvestment (military)Border SecuritySafe havenNational securityPolitical scienceEconomicsLawInternational economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian prosperity critically depends on the maintenance of an open and secure border between Canada and the United States. The reality is that 70 percent of our international trade is with the United States and that production has become highly integrated with value chains running back and forth across the border, sometimes many times. Even though it has become almost platitudinous to say that Canada and the United States have the world's longest undefended border, that does not necessarily mean that the border has not been an obstacle impeding the flow of trade, investment and people between the two countries. Over the years, Canadian governments have faced many challenges keeping the border open and have successfully approached the US government. Engaging the new Obama Administration in the United States to ensure a more open and secure border for trade, investment and people must be a high priority for the Canadian government. The Thickening of the Border after September 11 Even though the border was reopened quickly following the September 11th attacks, it was not the same as it had been. Under first the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and subsequendy the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFD\\), Canadian exports to the United States

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0190.015
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMunich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)Same topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207