MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impactos socioambientais do processo de ocupação da orla do município de Tefé/Amazonas - o bairro do Juruá

2012· dissertation· pt· W1924538300 on OpenAlexaff
Katia de Souza Porto

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability and Education
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSewerageGeographySanitationMunicipal solid wasteUrbanizationWork (physics)Environmental planningEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental engineeringEconomic growthEnvironmental scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMOO presente trabalho, da área da Geografia Urbana, trata dos impactos socioambientais do processo de ocupação da Orla do município de Tefé-AM, especificamente do bairro do Juruá.Objetiva-se analisar os fatores que influenciaram a referida ocupação.Para tanto, buscou-se respaldo em autores como Becker (1987( , 1991( , 1999( ), Carlos (2005( , 2009)), Corrêa (2004) e Santos (1982, 2008, 2009) para conceituar o que seja urbanização e produção do espaço urbano; procedeu-se a localização da área de estudo e a caracterização da problemática da carência e da precariedade da prestação de serviços de saneamento ambiental urbano ao bairro: abastecimento de água, esgotamento sanitário, disposição de resíduos sólidos, limpeza urbana e drenagem de águas pluviais.Buscou-se também, com o trabalho de campo, verificar como o bairro do Juruá consta do Plano Diretor de Tefé-AM; caracterizar o modo como os grupos sociais excluídos produzem espaço urbano e os impactos socioambientais gerados.Espera-se, com os resultados, o levantamento de subsídios para a elaboração de um plano de ação, junto aos órgãos municipais competentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Sustainability and EducationFrench-language works237,207