MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1925246835 · doi:10.1590/2175-623621808

Para uma Ética Renovada do Cuidar: à escuta do corpo sensível

2012· article· pt· W1925246835 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Lapointe, Jeanne-Marie Rugira

Bibliographic record

VenueEducação & Realidade · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO Este texto tenta evocar os elementos éticos do ato de cuidar a partir de uma visão antropológica inspiradora, bem como de uma visão renovada do ser humano, tal como é representada em suas experiências pessoal e profissional. Apresentamos uma pesquisa do tipo biográfico e de inspiração fenomenológica, cuja prática permite a harmonização pedagógica entre o soma e a psique. Assim, é nosso desejo responder à seguinte questão: é possível respeitar as necessidades ontológicas e espirituais do ser humano em práticas nas quais o corpo é reverenciado à altura do mistério de sua existência encarnada?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducação & RealidadeSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207