La contribution européenne au Programme mondial sur l'Efficacité de la Promotion de la Santé (GPHPE)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
de la Promotion de la Sante est coordonne par l’Union Internationale de Promotion de la Sante et d’Education pour la Sante (UIPES) en collaboration avec l’Organisation mondiale de la Sante, les Centres americains de Controle et de Prevention des Maladies (CDC) et de nombreux autres partenaires parmi lesquels la Fondation africaine de Recherche medicale (AMREF) ; Sante Canada ; l’Agence anglaise de Developpement de la Sante ; Promotion Sante Suisse ; l’Institut neerlandais de Promotion de la Sante et de Prevention des Maladies (NIGZ) ; et l’Association volontaire indienne pour la Sante (VHAI). Il s’agit d’un programme mondial unique qui vise a ameliorer la qualite des prises de decisions et des interventions promotrices de sante a travers le monde en evaluant les preuves de leur efficacite en terme d’impact sanitaire, social, economique et politique ; en traduisant les donnees probantes pour les decideurs, les enseignants, les praticiens et les chercheurs ; et en stimulant le Catherine Jones et David McQueen
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it