A simplified nonlinear approach for single pile settlement analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple analytical approach for nonlinear analysis of the load–displacement response of a single pile is presented. Two models are adopted in the proposed approach. One model uses a softening nonlinear relationship to simulate the degradation behavior between the unit skin friction and the pile–soil relative displacement developed in the pile–soil interface, and the other model adopts a bilinear load–displacement relationship to capture the pile-end response. Based on the two proposed models, a highly effective computer program has been developed for nonlinear analysis of the load–settlement behavior of a single pile. Comparisons are made between the present method, other analytical methods, and a well-documented field experimental pile loading case. The results of the comparisons indicate that the proposed method is generally in good agreement with field-observed behavior and the calculated results derived from other approaches. A parametric study is conducted to assess the influence of the parameters related to the proposed model on the load–displacement response of a single pile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it