Causes and pathogenesis of noma in Zinder (Niger): A socio-anthropological study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Noma is a gangrenous affliction that destroys the soft and hard tissue of the face. It affects exclusively young children from developing countries. Although the risk factors (malnutrition and debilitating diseases) are known, the cause remains a topic of debate. Etiological studies have tried to identify bacterial or viral agents responsible for the illness. We examine for the first time the possibility of a link between this illness and the social practices surrounding childbirth. METHODS: This study took place in Niger, where we conducted 18 ethnographic interviews with mothers from four villages. Noma was known in two villages, but unknown in the other two. RESULTS: Our results show that inadequate practices related to breastfeeding, weaning, and nutritional supplementation practices are by themselves insufficient to initiate the disease, insofar as most of these practices, paradoxically, were found in the villages not affected by the disease. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that these practices are not sufficient to explain noma. They suggest, however, that poor maternal health and nutritional status before and during pregnancy may have an irreversible negative impact on the child's overall health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it