MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1926111863 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5899

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENGINEERING AND THE TRADES THROUGH SERVICE LEARNING

2015· article· en· W1926111863 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Darlene Spracklin-Reid, Amanda Ryan, April Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicService-Learning and Community Engagement
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)General partnershipTeamworkService-learningApprenticeshipService (business)Value (mathematics)EngineeringEngineering managementEngineering educationKnowledge managementBusinessComputer scienceManagementMarketingSociologyPedagogyGeographyEconomicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Engineers and tradespeople have a longhistory of working together in a variety of industries. AtMemorial University, we are building that relationshipthrough service learning. In partnership with Togetherby Design, engineering students have the opportunity towork on community service projects with students,apprentices and journey persons from a variety of trades.Engineering students are able to learn from their fellowteam members, as well as share some of their own areasof expertise and skill. Through this collective learningprocess, relationships are established along with a mutualunderstanding of the value of teamwork.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.014
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0010.020
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicService-Learning and Community EngagementFrench-language works237,207