The prevalence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among outpatient children in a tertiary hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and objectives: The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections among previously healthy persons in community settings, without exposure to health care facilities, has been noted recently. Colonization rates of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) have been reported to range from 0 to 9.2 percent. The nose and open skin areas are considered the most important sites for colonization. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence and to describe the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of CA-MRSA among outpatient children. Patients and methods: We prospectively screened every third consecutive child presenting to our pediatric emergency department of King Saud Medical City, a 275 bed tertiary care teach-ing hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from March through July 2015. Results: We analyzed a total of 830 screening results (n = 478 males, 57.6%). Most of the screened patients were from Riyadh (n = 824, 99.3%). A total of 164 (19.8%) were found to be colonized with S. aureus, and of these 38 (4.6%) with MRSA. Thus, the MRSA rate amongst all S. aureus carriers was 23.2%. All MRSA were susceptible to vancomycin, (94.7%) were suscep-tible to linezolid, (65.8%) to clindamycin, and (89.5%) to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Conclusion: The rate of MRSA carriage among children in Riyadh province was within the range reported internationally. As the MRSA rate among S. aureus infected children was 23.2%, empirical MRSA coverage should be considered in children with suspected S. aureus infections. Copyright © 2015, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (General Organization), Saudi Arabia. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".