MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1926737064 · doi:10.1039/b104634a

On-line determination of dissolved phosphate in sea-water by ion-exclusion chromatography inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

2001· article· en· W1926737064 on OpenAlexaff
Lu Yang, Ralph E. Sturgeon, Joseph Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeawaterChemistryColorimetryDetection limitChromatographyStandard solutionPhosphateInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryStandard additionInductively coupled plasmaAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Mass spectrometryGeologyPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct determination of dissolved phosphate in sea-water by ion-exclusion chromatography in combination with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry is described. This method was developed as an independent, complementary approach to the standard colorimetric procedure used for the determination of dissolved phosphate in a proposed sea-water reference material. The developed on-line method is rapid, simple and accurate, requiring no sample pre-treatment. One determination can be completed in 6 min. The detection limit (3s), estimated at 0.06 µM (2.0 ng ml−1 as P) with injection of only 100 µl of sea-water, is superior to the 0.15 µM achieved using colorimetry. The dissolved phosphate concentration in sea-water of 1.69 ± 0.04 µM measured by a standard additions technique using the proposed method is in good agreement with the 1.71 ± 0.04 µM determined using a classic colorimetric approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometrySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207