Metal carbonyl complexes of phosphaamidines. Coordinative integrity detected in C-amino(λ<sup>3</sup>,σ<sup>2</sup>)-phosphaalkene isomers coordinated through n(P) HOMO−1 donor orbitals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal(0) complexes L(Cr,Mo,W)(CO)5 have been prepared from 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(4-methylphenyl)-3-aza-1(λ(3),σ(2))-phosphapropene and 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-aza-1(λ(3),σ(2))-phosphapropene using standard methods. Full characterization of four products and crystal structures of these complexes as well as the methoxyphenyl-phosphapropene are reported. The ligands coordinate κP, common for simple phosphaalkenes, despite the strongly-perturbing amino substitution at the double bond C atoms. Analyses of the NMR and vibrational spectroscopic data reveal that the complexes have very similar character to similarly-coordinated phosphaalkenes, with strong σ-donor character. The presence of some net π-interactions (acceptor or donor) is indicated by structures in which the ligands coordinate fully eclipsed with the M-CO groups. The synthetic and structural results have been augmented by B3PW91/LANL2DZ calculations that reproduce the structures of the Cr complexes accurately. The calculated vibrational spectra are used to confirm the assignment of the ν(C ≡ O) vibrational data. Detailed orbital interaction diagrams based on DFT calculations are reported for the title complexes as well as for the Cr(CO)5 complex of Mes-P=CPh2. The electronic absorption spectra of the title complexes have intense low-energy absorptions ranging from 24,500 to 25,300 cm(-1), which can be interpreted qualitatively using the DFT results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".