MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1926779273 · doi:10.3917/afco.242.0087

La population en droit constitutionnel

2012· article· fr· W1926779273 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Ondoua

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrique contemporaine · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceFrenchPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’approche classique de la souveraineté ne renseigne pas suffisamment sur l’organisation singulière des espaces politiques africains. En effet, placer la focale sur les concepts de peuple ou de nation peut conduire à une sorte de « myopie constitutionnelle », dès lors que de nombreux conflits politiques ou postélectoraux résultent souvent de l’absence de véritable prise en compte de la composition humaine des collectivités étatiques africaines. Une autre voie mérite par conséquent d’être explorée : mobiliser le concept de population (concept davantage utilisé dans les études démographiques) dans la compréhension et la construction des sociétés politiques à substrat humain complexe, à l’exemple des pays d’Afrique francophone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrique contemporaineSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207