MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Don Meinig as a Teacher

2009· article· en· W1926800396 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Western, Cynthia Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueGeographical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDozenTributeDiversity (politics)PoliticsHistorySociologyClassicsLawPolitical scienceArt historyMathematicsAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DON MEINIG AS AN UNDERGRADUATE INSTRUCTOR (BY JOHN WESTERN) It is abundantly clear that Donald Meinig, though so very eminent a research scholar, never skimped his undergraduate teaching. Entirely appropriately, his first arrival at Syracuse University from the University of Utah saw him rostered in, yes, Geo 101: World Our not-quite-complete archives reveal that from then until his retirement from undergraduate teaching in 1989 his major lower-division contributions were twofold. First was Man on the Earth: In the 1960s this was a year-long, two-semester sequence; it was retitled Cultural in 1972, and he taught it at least nine times. Then there was the semester-long Political course, which he also taught at least nine times. Historical Geography of the U.S. found itself taught at either the lower-division or at the joint upper-division/master's level; he offered the course a dozen times. In the upper division, Don taught World Cultures fourteen or more times. In addition, there were a number of other offerings over the years, with titles like American Culture (three times), Canada (three times), and American Diversity and Unity, an honors-students-only undergraduate seminar that he handed on to me when, in 1986, I was in my fourth semester at Syracuse and that I have held tightly and delightedly onto ever since. Vicki Andersen entered Syracuse University in 1985. When, after a hiatus of at least fifteen years, I contacted her to enquire whether she might be interested in playing a role in this tribute, she volunteered with alacrity. Here is what she then wrote to me: My first encounter with Professor Meinig was in a freshman geography survey class. His booming voice filled the auditorium as he lectured us. I remember thinking two things: he was a bit intimidating with all the information he presented, and this guy knows his stuff! He had so much knowledge to impart to us, though as a freshman I couldn't yet appreciate just how much. Senior year I took his Geo 414 class, American Historical Geography. Again, there was an amazing amount of information to digest, but in this small class setting, Professor Meinig's joy of teaching and his kindness made an impression on me. We became immersed in the development of America and used volume 1 of his The Shaping of America [1986], recently published at the time, as one of our textbooks. This fascinating book gave me insights into cultural patterns and the migrations of settlers in North America into separate regional societies, something I had not been aware of prior to this class. His geniality and moments of levity made us all comfortable with this knowledgeable man. Professor Meinig was a tough and demanding instructor. Working my tail off during the semester did not earn me the top marks I had sought. [A little later, however,] one of my greatest honors while at SU occurred during routine office hours with Professor Meinig. He indicated during our chat that he thought I was a fine geography student who would be probably be heading off to grad school. If so, he would happily write me a recommendation. I had no plans for grad school at the time, but the idea that DONALD MEINIG would write me a recommendation almost convinced me to ditch my postgraduation plans-- which didn't include any more studying!--and apply to grad school immediately ... I was that honored! In Fall Semester 1986 Sophie Oldfield began at Syracuse University. Immediately she found herself in Don's class on--the name escapes me--the world (!) This was in my first semester of university, my first semester at SU, and my first geography course and I basically was captivated. Two memories have surfaced: one was my task to nudge two friends who sat on either side of me in the second row when they fell asleep (pretty much daily) The second memory was receiving an A++ on the first test (probably my first test at university) and Meinig having written a note on the test to say please come and see him, which I did, and perhaps seeing a potential geographer, he sent me skipping down the corridor to meet you (quite literally! …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeographical ReviewSame topicAmerican History and CultureFrench-language works237,207