MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1926902435 · doi:10.1109/icpr.1998.711179

A system for segmenting ultrasound images

2002· article· en· W1926902435 on OpenAlexaff
Jiankang Wang, Xiabo Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeckle noiseArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceInitializationSpeckle patternNoise (video)Feature (linguistics)Image segmentationSegmentationMultiplicative noiseMaxima and minimaPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Segmentation of ultrasound images is difficult due to the existence of speckle noise. Erroneous edges from speckle noise are not only abundant but also have large magnitude due to the multiplicative nature of speckle noise. Moreover, boundary edges are usually incomplete, being missing or weak at some places. We propose a system to address these problems in two steps. First, based on the observation that boundaries in ultrasound images have the appearance of straight or gently curving line segments, we adopt Sha'ahsua and Ullman's (1988) saliency map method to reduce speckle noise and enhance edges. Then we use a new snake model, which we call a systolic snake, to perform a multi-level feature search. The systolic snake can not only overcome local minima, but also effectively use both strong and weak image information. Furthermore, the system can be used in an automatic system since, unlike other snake models, ours does not need a close initialization The resulting system is tested on some ultrasound loin images and results are promising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207