The Impact of Prophylactic Salpingo-oophorectomy on Health in Women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy, the preventive removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes, is recommended to women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in order to reduce the risk of breast, ovarian and fallopian tube cancer. The short and long term health and quality of life effects of this procedure are not well understood. We examined the actual and perceived reduction in cancer risk associated with this surgery. The impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on health-related quality of life, psychological distress, cancer worry, menopausal symptoms, and sexual function during the year following surgery was also evaluated. In our prospective study, prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with an 80% reduction in ovarian and fallopian tube cancer risk. The residual risk for primary peritoneal cancer was 0.2% per year or 4.3% at 20 years after salpingo-oophorectomy. Most women accurately perceived their risk of breast cancer. However, the risk for ovarian cancer was overestimated, particularly by women who carry a BRCA2 mutation. Physical and mental health-related quality of life did not decrease in the year following surgery; and psychological distress was similar to levels experienced by the general population. Most women were significantly less worried about cancer after the surgery, however, a subset of women continued to experience significant cancer specific distress after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy. Women who underwent prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy when premenopausal experienced a significant worsening of vasomotor symptoms and a decline in sexual functioning. Hormone replacement therapy mitigated these symptoms, but not to pre-surgical levels. Dyspareunia was somewhat alleviated by hormone replacement therapy, however, the decrease in sexual pleasure was not. Satisfaction with the decision to undergo prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was high regardless of these symptoms. These studies will provide women who are considering prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy with information about the reduction in cancer risk associated with the surgery and the possible effects experienced during the year following surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".