Bibliographic record
Abstract
The planning of Zanzibar was taken into hands by the British colonial administration in order to develop a neatly segregated modern city. In this process, the historic eastern part of the city, Ng'ambo, was stigmatized as the informal, native quarter, as opposed to the elite part of the city, 'Stone Town'. Notwithstanding the multiple attempts to replace Ng'ambo with a planned modernist quarter, Ng'ambo resisted and developed its own modernity. Beplanning en herbeplanning van Ng'ambo, Zanzibar De planning van Zanzibar werd in handen genomen door het Britse koloniale bestuur om een keurig gescheiden moderne stad te ontwikkelen. In dit proces, werd het historische oostelijke deel van de stad, Ng'ambo of 'de Andere Kant', gebrandmerkt als het informele, inheemse kwartier, in tegenstelling tot 'Stone Town', het elite deel van de stad. Niettegenstaande de vele pogingen om Ng'ambo vervangen door een geplande modernistische wijk, verzette Ng'ambo zich en ontwikkelde haar eigen moderniteit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".