MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1927293720 · doi:10.3917/spub.134.0527

Préfinancement communautaire : le consentement à payer des ménages pour les soins de santé primaires au Bénin

2013· article· fr· W1927293720 on OpenAlexaff
Sanni Yaya, Guy Sourou Nouatin, Sagbohan Jacques Singbo

Bibliographic record

VenueSanté Publique · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealthcare Systems and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine factors associated with Benin rural households' willingness to pre-finance their primary health care. METHODS: This study was conducted in Sèmè-Podji, Department Ouémé Benin. The contingent valuation method, namely "bidding game" or "dichotomous choice" was used to determine the willingness to pay for health care. We conducted a probit regression analysis on a sample of 150 rural households. RESULTS: The value of household willingness to pre-finance their primary health care is between 6,000 and 12,000 FCFA per person per year with a median value of 8,000 FCFA/person/year. This value is determined by several factors. Income level, age, usage patterns of health services and promptness in receiving patients have a positive impact on the households' willingness to pay for their health care. The physical characteristics of health centers seem to constitute a barrier to the willingness to pay for health care. CONCLUSION: The pre-financing of health care by households is determined by socio-economic characteristics as well as physical characteristics of health centers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSanté PubliqueSame topicHealthcare Systems and ReformsFrench-language works237,207