Reaction products of diorganotin(IV) oxides, R<sub>2</sub>SnO, with nitric acid. Part 1: R = methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of diorganotin(IV) oxides, R2SnO with R = Me, Et, and i-Pr, with nitric acid in different stoichiometric ratios resulted in the formation of different products depending on the organic groups. The diorganotin(IV) nitrate hydroxides Me2Sn(NO3)(OH) (1a) Et2Sn(NO3)(OH), α-1b, β-1b, i-Pr2Sn(NO3)(OH) (1c), the diisopropyltin(IV) dinitrate dihydrate, i-Pr2Sn(NO3)2·2H2O (2c) and the diisopropyltin(IV) nitrate oxalate dihydrate, [i-Pr2Sn(NO3)]2Ox·2H2O (3) as side-product. On examination of the solubility of the primary reaction products in different solvents, the two additional compounds Me2Sn(NO3)(OH)·DMSO (4) and 2i-Pr2Sn(NO3)2·3DMSO = [i-Pr2Sn(NO3)(dmso)3] [i-Pr2Sn(NO3)3] (5) have been isolated. All compounds have been structurally characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction with special respect to dimensionality (1a, α-1b, 1c = dimeric molecules hydrogen bonded to one-dimensional chains; β-1b = two-dimensional coordination polymer; 2c = monomeric; 3 = monomeric, tin atoms linked via a double side-on chelating oxalate ion; 4 = dimeric, 5 = monomeric anion/cation), tin coordination (trigonal-bipyramidal = 1a, α-1b, 1c; six-fold = β-1b; seven-fold = 3, 4, 5-cation; eight-fold = 2c, 5-anion) and nitrate bonding modes (monodentate = 1a, α-1b, 1c; unsymmetrical bidentate = 3, symmetrical bidentate = 3, 4, 5-cation, 5-anion; syn-anti bridging = β-1b), the latter one being analysed using both, Sn–O and N–O distances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".