MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W192766951 · doi:10.7202/1068644ar

KARLSRUHE-LUXEMBOURG: A NEW DISTANCE AFTER THE 2009 LISBON TREATY RULING

2020· article· en· W192766951 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francesca Astengo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Union Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRatificationGermanTreatyConstitutional courtTreaty of LisbonPolitical scienceLawJurisprudenceEuropean unionPreliminary rulingSovereigntyEuropean Union lawEuropean integrationEconomic JusticeInternational tradeGeographyConstitutionEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2009 decision on the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty by the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) is a landmark ruling on European integration. According to the FCC, the Lisbon Treaty is compatible with the German Basic Law because it does not lead to the creation of a European State. Despite the presence of some continuity with the previous jurisprudence on German participation in the EU, the Lisbon ruling took some of the arguments to a new level with regard to national sovereignty and the limits of European integration. This article highlights the elements of the decision which were set on a path of collision with the interpretations of the European Court of Justice marking an increased distance between Luxembourg and Karlsruhe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de droit internationalSame topicEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207