Identification of Testis‐Specific Male Contraceptive Targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an effort to identify novel targets for the development of nonhormonal male contraceptives, genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the rat testis was performed. Specifically, enzymatically purified spermatogonia plus early spermatocyctes, pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids, and Sertoli cells was analyzed along with microdissected rat seminiferous tubules at stages I, II-III, IV-V, VI, VIIa,b, VIIc,d, VIII, IX- XI, XII, XIII-XIV of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium using RAE 230_2.0 microarrays. The combined analysis of these studies identified 16,971 expressed probe sets on the array. How these expression data, combined with additional bioinformatic data analysis and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis, led to the identification of 58 genes that have 1000-fold higher expression transcriptionally in the testis when compared to over 20 other nonreproductive tissues is described. The products of these genes may play important roles in testicular and/or sperm function, and further investigation on their utility as nonhormonal contraceptive targets is warranted. Moreover, these microarray data have been used to expedite the identification of a mutation in RIKEN cDNA 2410004F06 gene as likely being responsible for spermatogenic failure in a line of infertile mice generated by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis. The microarray data and the qRT-PCR data described are available in the Mammalian Reproductive Genetics database (http://mrg.genetics.washington.edu/).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".