MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structured practical experience for Canadian student pharmacists in Ghana

2013· letter· en· W1927894506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyle John Wilby

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical educationFamily medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volunteering in developing countries is becoming popular for pharmacists and student pharmacists. Additionally, students may receive academic credit for these experiences. It is rare, however, for these internships to be structured and precepted by a practising pharmacist with significant experience working in the local environment. This letter reports a structured practical experience in Ghana for six student pharmacists from the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada), who received academic credit for their time spent in Ghana. The rotation occurred over 5 weeks in March to April 2012 and the primary instructor was a practising pharmacist in Canada who had previously spent 1 year in Ghana developing and coordinating health and medical internships. Local staff at each placement site (described below) were designated as supervisors for the students’ daily work. The objectives by the end of the rotation were to describe contributions of pharmacists in international health settings, to perform daily pharmacy-related activities at a supervised placement site, to create and disseminate at least one health promotion project and to describe pharmacotherapy and treatment principles for malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/ AIDS. In order to accomplish these objectives, the rotation consisted of three core components: a supervised placement, weekly therapeutic topic discussions and a major health promotion/education project. The rotation was supplemented with smaller health promotion projects and cultural integration activities. The students also had the opportunity to visit different regions of Ghana, in order to observe pharmacy practice and health needs of communities throughout the country. Placement sites consisted of an urban hospital, three rural clinics, an out-patient pharmacy and multiple chemical shops (selling analgesics, antimalarials and herbal products) in various localities. Medications were available at each establishment, with chemist shops being the most limited in terms of medication availability (some examples include: antibiotics, antimalarial drugs, antihistamines, cough and cold preparations, herbal products and non-narcotic analgesics). Students worked alongside local staff at each site.All activities were completed under supervision of placement staff and in correspondence with the preceptor from Canada. Students engaged in medication dispensing, counselling and patient education, assistance with physical assessments, health record documentation, diagnostic and laboratory assessments and administrative activities. The health promotion project was based on needs reported by local health workers, and content covered both sanitation (hand hygiene, waste management) and principles of medication use (purpose of medications, dosage instructions, adverse effects). The students developed the presentation in collaboration with both local staff and the preceptor in Canada. The presentation was given verbally in English and the local dialect of the audience (translated by a community member). Students used visual aids and interactions with the audience where applicable. Topic discussions were an integral part of the rotation and covered the disease states of malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/ AIDS. Leading questions were developed by the preceptor and distributed to students throughout the rotation. The students were also supplied with treatment guidelines and primary literature as resources for discussions. Students were expected to relate their learning to each practice site they encountered and to compare and contrast diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of these conditions between placement sites. Each week, the preceptor spent approximately 1 hour with the students facilitating discussion and ensuring learning points were achieved. Students were evaluated by the staff at placement sites and the instructor in Canada. Evaluations were based on a standardized form from the University of Saskatchewan Structured Practical Experiences Program. The domains of the form included demonstration of learning, communication with instructors and patients, attendance and reliability, task accomplishment, professionalism, leadership and decisionmaking, integration into the workplace, preparedness for topic discussions and overall assessment. Students were asked to evaluate the rotation with respect to satisfaction, meeting of objectives, strengths and areas to improve for both the rotation and preceptorship, and an overall assessment. Student feedback was favourable, with specific comments incorporated into future directions described below. bs_bs_banner

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Pharmacy PracticeSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207