China Central Area's Economic Growth Mechanism Analysis ANALYSE DE LA VOIE DE CROISSANCE ECONOMIQUE DE LA REGION CENTRALE DE CHINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through the regression analysis of the related data collected from 1991 to 2005 in China different economic areas, this paper has indicated the China central area’s economic growth mechanism. The result shows that consumption demand is the dominating factor driving the central area’s economic growth, while the investment demand and the exporting oriented economy have relatively little effects. Key words: central area’s economic growth, consumption demand , investment demand, exporting oriented economy Resume: A travers l’analyse des donnees recueillies de 1991 a 2005 dans de differents domaines economiques de la Chine, cet article indique la voie de croissance economique de la region centrale chinoise. Le resultat montre que la demande de consommation est un facteur dominant qui pousse la croissance economique tandis que la demande d’investissement et l’economie d’exportation exercent des effets relativement petits. Mots-Cles: croissance economique de la region centrale, demande de consommation, demande d’investissement, economie d’exportation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".