MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1928257496

兩大法系的「無縫對接」:魁北克高等法學教育探微-以麥吉爾大學及蒙特婁大學的「跨法系」學位制度為例

2013· article· zh· W1928257496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
金成波

Bibliographic record

Venue法令月刊 · 2013
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComparative and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawJurisdictionPolitical scienceLegal educationLegal professionLegal researchLegal historyLegal practiceProfessionalizationCivil law (Civil law)Common lawSociologyPublic law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The legal education and legal practice are intergrated closely. In a mixed jurisdiction such as Quebec, legal education also reflects mixed characteristic, 1 ike two major universities in Quebec: McGill University offers the combined B. C. L. /LL.B. program, leading to law degrees in civil law and common law studies which will take 4-5 years; the University of Montreal offers 1 year North American Common Law (JD) program, which is add on 3 years civil law studies. The orientation, requirement and trainning method of these two programs are all different, but they both reply the legal practice and highlight the tropism of professionalization of legal education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue法令月刊Same topicComparative and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207